FACILITY INVENTORY ANALYSIS 5.1 It is imperative that the EFMP provide the information necessary to make objective data driven decisions. The culmination of this data for our facilities can be found in the Facility Needs Indexes (found in the next section). These spreadsheets weight the critical facility data in order to better prioritize capital spending. The spreadsheets are composed of several key components, which will be defined in the following section: 1. FCI – Facility Condition Index a. An industry standard index that objectively measures the current condition of the facility (3rd party assessment). 2. PI – Program Index a. An index that measures the educational program adequacy by building size. 3. U% - Utilization a. A measure of a school’s capacity efficiency (FTE/State Rated ` Capacity). 4. FTE – Full Time Equivalent (Enrollment) a. Captures the schools where we can have the greatest impact on the greatest number of students. 5. FQI – Facility Quality Index a. Condition of the facility plus our ability to adequately teach in the available space (FCI+PI). The data for each of these categories can be found in figure 1 below. The schools are ranked 24-1 (24 total schools), with 1 representing the best school and 24 representing the worst school in that category. While each category is important, it is essential that the data be weighted in an objective manner that will help determine a priority order of where dollars should be spent. FCI PI FQI UT FTE Mardela MHS 70 24 Westside Primary 57 24 Fruitland Primary 102 24 Prince Street ES 139% 24 James M.Bennett HS 1343 24 Fruitland Primary 64 23 Northwestern ES 53 23 Chipman ES 100 23 Northwestern ES 136% 23 Wicomico HS 1325 23 Chipman ES 63 22 Chipman ES 45 22 Westside Primary 97 22 Delmar ES 126% 22 Parkside HS 1160 22 Wicomico HS 51 21 Delmar ES 44 21 Mardela MHS 89 21 Parkside HS 123% 21 Bennett MS 906 21 Pinehurst ES 50 20 Fruitland Primary 35 20 Northwestern ES 77 20 Mardela MHS 112% 20 Salisbury MS 873 20 Wicomico MS 49 19 Pittsville EMS 25 19 Delmar ES 74 19 Wicomico HS 109% 19 Delmar ES 858 19 Fruitland Intermediate 49 18 Westside Intermediate 23 18 Fruitland Intermediate 69 18 Pinehurst ES 104% 18 Prince Street ES 854 18 East Salisbury ES 46 17 Fruitland Intermediate 19 17 Wicomico HS 64 17 Fruitland Intermediate 104% 17 Wicomico MS 819 17 Glen Avenue ES 43 16 Mardela MHS 19 16 Pinehurst ES 55 16 Pemberton ES 101% 16 Mardela MHS 691 16 Parkside HS 40 15 Pemberton ES 13 15 Parkside HS 55 15 North Salisbury ES 100% 15 Beaver Run ES 652 15 Westside Primary 37 14 Parkside HS 13 14 Westside Intermediate 53 14 East Salisbury ES 99% 14 Pemberton ES 529 14 Salisbury MS 36 13 Wicomico HS 11 13 Wicomico MS 52 13 West Salisbury ES 98% 13 North Salisbury ES 505 13 Delmar ES 32 12 Glen Avenue ES 5 12 Glen Avenue ES 49 12 Beaver Run ES 98% 12 Pinehurst ES 486 12 Westside Intermediate 31 11 Salisbury MS 5 11 East Salisbury ES 48 11 Westside Primary 96% 11 Fruitland Primary 441 11 Willards ES 29 10 Pinehurst ES 4 10 Pittsville EMS 47 10 Fruitland Primary 93% 10 East Salisbury ES 421 10 Pemberton ES 29 9 Prince Street ES 4 9 Pemberton ES 41 9 James M.Bennett HS 90% 9 Fruitland Intermediate 393 9 James M.Bennett HS 29 8 Wicomico MS 1 8 Salisbury MS 38 8 Wicomico MS 90% 8 Glen Avenue ES 379 8 Northwestern ES 25 7 East Salisbury ES 0 7 Willards ES 29 7 Salisbury MS 87% 7 West Salisbury ES 346 7 Pittsville EMS 22 6 Willards ES 0 6 James M.Bennett HS 25 6 Willards ES 85% 6 Westside Intermediate 343 6 North Salisbury ES 18 5 North Salisbury ES 0 5 North Salisbury ES 21 5 Westside Intermediate 83% 5 Northwestern ES 341 5 Prince Street ES 17 4 James M.Bennett HS 0 4 Prince Street ES 16 4 Bennett MS 81% 4 Pittsville EMS 329 4 Bennett MS 12 3 Bennett MS 0 3 Bennett MS 2 3 Glen Avenue ES 81% 3 Willards ES 309 3 West Salisbury ES 2 2 West Salisbury ES 0 2 West Salisbury ES 0 2 Chipman ES 68% 2 Chipman ES 262 2 Beaver Run ES 0 1 Beaver Run ES 0 1 Beaver Run ES 0 1 Pittsville EMS 65% 1 Westside Primary 192 1 Figure 1 133
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTI2NzY2OQ==